On Sunday, October 2, 2016 at 12:38:00 AM UTC+8, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 8:55 AM, T L <tapi...@gmail.com <javascript:>> > wrote: > > > > On Saturday, October 1, 2016 at 11:29:35 PM UTC+8, Axel Wagner wrote: > >> > >> It *is* possible to define two named types with the same name (which > are > >> not identical according to the spec): > >> https://play.golang.org/p/PmkcvdNQnx > > > > > > Oh, never know we can define local types! > > > > But, from my understanding, according to the spec, the two local X types > are > > identical. > > But the compiler doesn't think so. > > A compiler bug? > > I'm sorry, I don't follow your argument. The spec says, as you've > already quoted, "Two named types are identical if their type names > originate in the same TypeSpec." In the playground example above, the > two types named "X" do not originate in the same TypeSpec, so they are > not identical. > > Ian >
Then could you provide an example two identical custom named types originate in the same TypeSpec? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
