It is a significant frustration for me, actually.
What I do is to leave out the test completely at the top and put it at the
bottom , Just as you show. Comes up often in linked-list traversal and math
code.
From: <golang-nuts@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Jonathan <jtc...@gmail.com>
Date: Friday, October 7, 2016 at 4:44 PM
To: golang-nuts <golang-nuts@googlegroups.com>
Cc: <xiiop...@gmail.com>
Subject: [go-nuts] Re: tidy way to write a repeat-until in golang
for i := a.X;; i = i + b.X - a.X {
//stuff
if i != b.x {
break
}
}
On Friday, October 7, 2016 at 7:25:02 PM UTC-4, xiio...@gmail.com wrote:
Any suggestions on a way to write a repeat until loop equivalent in golang that
looks tidy
currently I do :
ib := true
for i := a.X; i != b.X || ib; i = i + b.X - a.X {
ib = false
//stuff
}
for loops that need to be executed once under all conditions..
maybe there's neater or better way ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
