On Sunday, 16 October 2016 08:40:32 UTC-4, Sokolov Yura wrote:
> "future" is commonly used synchronization abstraction.
> It could be implemented in a library, using mutex, channel and interface.
If it can be implemented as a library, why build it in to the language?
You don't need futures very often---far less than, say, Mutex, and mutexes
aren't built into the language either.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.