+1 for 'Web-assembly is still some time in the *feature*'
On Sunday, July 12, 2015 at 8:15:41 AM UTC+1, Axel Wagner wrote:
> > My understanding, and I could be wrong, is that web assembly is
> > largely a binary pre-parsed tree of asm.js source. I imagine it is
> > easier to add a deploy target to gopherjs then anything else since it
> I assume, the way to webassembly for go will be llgo. Very simply,
> because it's a llvm frontend, there will be an llvm backend for
> web-assembly, so it should be pretty much trivial combining the two.
> Anyway. Web-assembly is still some time in the feature. There isn't even
> so much as a specification. I wouldn't sweat it quite yet.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.