Interesting. I have never used var this way. I am the student here. (as in everything else!)
From: Axel Wagner <axel.wagner...@googlemail.com> Date: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 at 2:39 PM To: Michael Jones <michael.jo...@gmail.com> Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <i...@golang.org>, T L <tapir....@gmail.com>, golang-nuts <golang-nuts@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [go-nuts] Are short variable declarations necessary? var could do that too: https://play.golang.org/p/v9pQSZPTh_ (not that I'm advocating in favor of var in more places) On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Michael Jones <michael.jo...@gmail.com> wrote: In fact, this example hints at something important. You could do as you say and create variables of *different* types which I find very general compared to the suggested var feature: for a, b, c := 0, 0.5, big.NewFloat(0.5).SetPrec(200); a < 15; a++ { (https://play.golang.org/p/OM7OC3R949) -----Original Message----- From: <golang-nuts@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Ian Lance Taylor <i...@golang.org> Date: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 at 12:25 PM To: Michael Jones <michael.jo...@gmail.com> Cc: T L <tapir....@gmail.com>, golang-nuts <golang-nuts@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [go-nuts] Are short variable declarations necessary? You can create multiple local variables in the for scope by writing, for example for a, b := 0, 10; a < b; a++ { (That would work with var, too). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
