On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 09:49:24 -0700 (PDT)
Nate Finch <nate.fi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> One of the problems with working with serialization of any kind is
> dealing with unset vs the zero value.  The usual way to get around
> this is to use a pointer, nil is unset, non-nil is set.  But this
> gets annoying when trying to make literal values, because you can't
> take the address of a constant:
> 
> type Foo struct {
>     Count *int
> }
> f := Foo{ Count: &5 }
> 
> // cannot take the address of 5

See also the recent thread (14 Oct) on the same topic:
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/golang-nuts/NR_oWflin-Q/discussion

[...]

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to