Expose properties as methods and do the check in the method can make the
caller use easier.

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017, 14:41 <mhhc...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> some simple leads,
>
> Use one line initialization of Person
> p := &Person{Attr:&Attribute{}}
>
> Enhance the if conditions statement
>     if p.Attr != nil && p.Attr.Age < 10 {
>         fmt.Println("Too Young")
>     }
>
> Use a Person constructor
> func NewPerson() &Person {
>     return &Person{Attr:&Attribute{}}
> }
>
>
> I, too, dislike that default values for struct pointer properties is nil.
>
>
>
> On Friday, January 13, 2017 at 2:26:12 PM UTC+1, mail...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Have been struggling with mitigating against nil pointer deference and i
> would appreciate if anyone can help
>
> Code 1:   Works file
> https://play.golang.org/p/lhOh9g5R9l
>
>
> Code 2: Error
> https://play.golang.org/p/pY4F9bK-D9
>
>
> How do you validate Attr was set if its a pointer ?
>
> Thanks In Advance
> Teety
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "golang-nuts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to