But is it possible to finalize a discussion about finalizers?
John
John Souvestre - New Orleans LA
From: Michael Jones [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 2017 January 29, Sun 20:38
To: Val
Cc: golang-nuts; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [go-nuts] Re: I know finalizers are not promised to be called, but
is it too not promised?
"endeavor to"
"anticipate"
"allow for"
"prepare for"
"encourage"
"facilitate"
...good
"ensure" / "force" / "guarantee" (not in your control)
"reclaim" / "recycle" / "release" (too absolute)
...bad
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Val <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello Jesper
if I understand this thread correctly, "make sure" should be rephrased by "make
extra efforts for ...".
Sorry for nitpicking (not trying to look pedantic or arrogant)
Val
On Sunday, January 29, 2017 at 4:28:09 PM UTC+1, Jesper Louis Andersen wrote:
you'd like to eventually make sure that you don't leak said resource
...
the library makes sure that it handles it itself, though with added resource
pressure as a result.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
Michael T. Jones
[email protected]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
