Ni Nick.
Is 1GB too much? What is your target for number of connections and max memory
size?
You are using about 100KB per connection? Is there any way to reduce this?
The goroutine certainly isn’t much of that. Perhaps some way of using a
smaller buffer while idling?
Go does use epoll, but not sharing the memory. It sounds like it might be a
nice option for the future, however.
John
John Souvestre - New Orleans LA
From: golang-nuts@googlegroups.com [mailto:golang-nuts@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Nick Rio
Sent: 2017 March 06, Mon 02:26
To: golang-nuts
Subject: Re: [go-nuts] Re: How can I implement a TCP server using a model which
similar to epoll (or kqueue, IOCP) rather than just using goroutine for each
client?
Hi John,
The application is working right now. Current work for me is to found a way to
reduce it's memory footprint as it will take at least 1GB memory to hold only
C10K idle connections.
I know it's mainly me causing such memory usage, so I just want to know if
there are a better way to get around my problem without changing too many of
those already existing design. That's is when the epoll-style idea came out.
+ epoll-styled design is seems suits better for my application by nature.
I really hope Golang can have it built in though.
On Monday, March 6, 2017 at 3:54:19 PM UTC+8, John Souvestre wrote:
What you propose sounds like a lot of extra work at the onset. Consider
starting with a simple trial version of your program would get you up and
running with less effort. This way you could see whether CPU or memory is the
limiting factor, and could work to optimize just that factor (and not waste
time on the wrong factor). Or perhaps the trial version will achieve your
goals without having to do any optimization. J
John
John Souvestre - New Orleans LA
From: golan...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
[mailto:golan...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> ] On Behalf Of Nick Rio
Sent: 2017 March 05, Sun 23:28
To: golang-nuts
Subject: [go-nuts] Re: How can I implement a TCP server using a model which
similar to epoll (or kqueue, IOCP) rather than just using goroutine for each
client?
Thank you for reply.
No guys, it's me using too many memories, not Goroutine.
However, I believe if I can make those code in epoll-style, I can then build a
task queue to handle those connections one by one in a queue when they back to
active. For example, start one *accepter* goroutine + few *worker* goroutines.
Then I could do buffer sharing within each *worker* instead of each
connections. Which well reduce a huge bunch of memory requirement + also reduce
numbers of goroutine.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> .
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
