Nothing wrong with it, and nothing wrong with doing it for min and max either. (Though it was a delight to see that animated editing sequence, so for entertainment value that's the way!)
I did code generation for my version of Sort and it is 3x-5x faster. It takes intel more than 10 years to make a CPU that is 3-5x faster. Takes just one programmer hour to perfect it with code generation. Nothing wrong with that equation. Let them laugh all they want while you build for speed. Michael On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Tyler Compton <xavi...@gmail.com> wrote: > If we assume a more useful generic task than writing a min function, > what's wrong with using code generation? > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 6:14 AM Henry <henry.adisuma...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> If you insist on generics-like code generation: >> https://github.com/cheekybits/genny/blob/master/README.md >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "golang-nuts" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Michael T. Jones michael.jo...@gmail.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
