On Thursday, May 4, 2017 at 1:21:52 AM UTC+8, Axel Wagner wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 7:04 PM, T L <tapi...@gmail.com <javascript:>>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, May 4, 2017 at 12:46:47 AM UTC+8, Axel Wagner wrote:
>>>
>>> but
>>> const (
>>> a = iota
>>> b
>>> s string
>>> d
>>> )
>>> is not a valid declaration. You can't say "the rule is the same for
>>> constants".
>>>
>>
>> For the same rule, I mean just copying the corresponding part from last
>> line.
>> Yes, declared constant must be assigned. This is an unrelated rule for
>> this topic.
>>
>
> No, it is not an unrelated rule. Because it means that "just like for
> consts" isn't an argument. You need, at the very least, answer the valid
> question ("what happens with that var-declaration and why?") raised about
> your proposal. Or better yet, realize that var and const declarations
> behave very differently and thus "consistency" isn't an argument to add
> something otherwise useless.
>
>
ok, I admit the rule difference between variable and constant declaration
does matter:
var (
a int = iota
b // should autocomplete
c int // but this? "c int" is already legal.
)
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Again: const-declarations and variable declarations are very different.
>>> You can not argue "it's the same"; it's not.
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 6:28 PM, T L <tapi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday, May 4, 2017 at 12:17:13 AM UTC+8, Jan Mercl wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 6:00 PM T L <tapi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > Just like what expected for constants.
>>>>>
>>>>> For constants it's expected to reuse the last iota expression when
>>>>> absent. Do you propose that
>>>>>
>>>>> var (
>>>>> a = iota
>>>>> b
>>>>> )
>>>>>
>>>>> will become valid and initialize a to 0 and b to 1?
>>>>>
>>>>> If so, is it valid and what shall happen when one writes
>>>>>
>>>>> var (
>>>>> a = iota
>>>>> b
>>>>> s string
>>>>> d
>>>>> )
>>>>>
>>>>> ?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The rule is same for constants: d is also string, as s.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If it's not valid, why?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> -j
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "golang-nuts" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to golang-nuts...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "golang-nuts" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to golang-nuts...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
