On 2017-05-08 11:55, dc0d wrote:
So just Value(...) then? Of-course I've implemented an adapter with no
extra fields, just with some methods to work with Value(...).


Yeah...that would be my best advice - unless someone else can demonstrate a clean way to extend context.Context.

/Peter

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to