Am Mittwoch, 9. August 2017 23:29:13 UTC+2 schrieb DV:
> On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 5:37:42 AM UTC-6, Haddock wrote:
>> In my opinion generics added to Go would make Go really take off. 
>> Currently Java developers would not change to Go. With Go having generics 
>> this would change and more people would consider Go also when not coming 
>> from Java/C#/etc.
> There's no way that any serious Java dev would ever consider Go, generics 
> or not. Why, in Go, you just....write code! In functions! Not a single 
> AbstractSingletonFactoryImpl in sight! </tongueincheek>
> I used to do C# for a living, and Java before that. What drew me to Go was 
> that it was *not* C# nor Java. That's actually the beautiful thing about 
> it. 

Go does not have the modeling power of Java, C#, Python, etc. The language 
is too simple for that. So Go is not really the real thing for application 
development. But generics would make it possible to drag many things up. 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
For more options, visit

Reply via email to