To get bitbucket.org/zombiezen/gopdf/... to install, you will need to
install mercurial.




On Thu, 2017-09-28 at 23:49 -0700, Vikram Rawat wrote:
> Thanks for your reply. Library seems promising. but when I run it ,
> this 
> errors out
> 
> 
> 
> cannot find package "bitbucket.org/zombiezen/gopdf/pdf" in any of:
> C:\Go\src\bitbucket.org\zombiezen\gopdf\pdf (from $GOROOT)
> C:\Projects\Go\src\bitbucket.org\zombiezen\gopdf\pdf (from $GOPATH)
> 
> 
> 
> when I try go get on these packages they don't work either.
> 
> C:\Projects\Go\src>go get bitbucket.org/zombiezen/gopdf/pdf
> go: missing Mercurial command. See https://golang.org/s/gogetcmd
> package bitbucket.org/zombiezen/gopdf/pdf: exec: "hg": executable
> file not 
> found in %PATH%
>  
>  
> 
> > 
> > I saw a talk on some youtube regarding go in data science. I
> > learned go 2 
> > months ago but now I feel like it's an entirely different beast.
> > look I am 
> > just trying to learn GOLANG so that when I need to build something
> > may be 
> > after 5 to 10 months I would be comfirtable working with it. So
> > Right now I 
> > don't have a use case scnario. I am just trying to learn the
> > language.
> 
> 
> But there are a lot of improvements needed like
> 
> 1. 49 lines of code just to create a flat basic line chart for
> random 
> numbers. and that's when I haven't even got my data in from the
> database or 
> did some background coloring.
> 2. Loops are not good while creating graphs you know them I don't I
> can 
> miss one and mess it up entirely. With loops, I would never be sure
> if I 
> have created the right graph. Loops should just run in the background
> not 
> for me to see or create.
> 3. The syntax just doesn't feel intuitive. I feel like nobody would
> be able 
> to predict the next command in the sequence. You must know now there
> is a 
> grammar of graphics. it's used in ggplot2, ggvis, vega, vega-lite,
> and many 
> python packages as well.
> 4. Analysts don't care about speed (maybe a bit) but data. What they
> do 
> care about is their data code should be easy else your mind will be 
> occupied by typing and thinking code when it should be thinking about
> data.
> 
> 
> today I just feel like golang doesn't have ploting libraries they
> never 
> thought it was necessary but straight away starting comparing it to
> python.
> 
> but can you please tell me how to run those examples. I am not able
> to run 
> it. what am I doing wrong.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to