In docs for boltdb it is stated that NoSync should be used very carefully because it can leave the database in an inconsistent state.
If a full fledged distributed database was the case, a no-sync manner would be acceptable. But for an embedded database, it is not a plus (to be performant in no-sync mode, assuming that mode would not leave database in an inconsistent state, in case of a dirty shutdown of the app or the machine). On Saturday, January 20, 2018 at 3:56:10 PM UTC+3:30, Jordan Krage wrote: > > Are you using 'SyncWrites=false'? (Or 'NoSync' with boltdb?) > > It looks like the badger benchmarks from github.com/dgraph-io/badger-bench > do not sync. > > > On Thursday, January 18, 2018 at 1:33:02 PM UTC-6, dc0d wrote: >> >> Badger write performance is a bit worse than boltdb. And badger suggests >> to batch writes. But so does boltdb. >> >> At the same time at badger's GitHub page it says it has higher write >> performance compared to boltdb. >> >> Is there a sample of how to do high performance/throughput writes with >> badger? >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
