I searched the whole mailing list and haven't found any discussion so
wanted to ask directly. What was the thinking behind using reversed
polynomials in the crc32 instead of the normal ones (or giving an option to
use either at will). At times it may produce complications (as it did in my
case while my colleague just found out that Google's hashing library for
java [guava] implements the normal form (actually hardcodes the table in
If anyone knows what was the thinking/decision behind this choice and has
time to share, would love to learn more about it.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.