> > These threads are akin to bike shedding thus a waste of time.
In storytelling relief is part of good tragedy. I consider the overloading of for to be a plus because for, while, do-while are just loops with conditions. Maybe ‘loop’ is a more Go-like keyword. loop i, e := range c { Matt On Thursday, May 3, 2018 at 8:46:36 AM UTC-5, M P r a d e s wrote: > > Can anybody point me to a single discussion on golang-nuts that led to a > significant syntax change? These threads are akin to bike shedding thus a > waste of time. > > Adding while provide nothing of value in a language that supports basic > looping. And for those who compare if and switch arguing it is equivalent, > you can't do type switches with an if statement. > > This is discussion is going nowhere. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.