I see your point! Line 46 would never be in production, that was just to return 
for the specific situation I was testing, but the other loop would make more 
sense using sync. I'll take a look into sync functionality as I've not used it 
before, but that seems like the idiomatic way to do it! Thanks again!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to