Hi Justin,

Yes, it is using index scan, which makes me even more puzzled.

On Tuesday, May 22, 2018 at 3:45:29 PM UTC+7, Justin Israel wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2018, 6:35 PM Hawari Rahman <hawari....@gmail.com 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> After some more detailed investigation, it seems the most time consuming 
>> process is a "Select by IDs" query. So to hydrate a Collection object, I 
>> need to retrieve another objects through a SELECT WHERE id = ANY(?)" query 
>> in postgres. I'm curious on how the performance can differs greatly when 
>> concurrency is introduced.
>>
>
> Is the query doing a table scan vs using the index? 
>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "golang-nuts" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to golang-nuts...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to