I wasn’t suggesting that Go should resemble Java. I was just trying to point out that many of the current issues under debate for Go2 have been resolved quite well in other languages, and looking to them for direction should not be out of bounds just because they are not Go. That’s a little short sighted IMO.
> On Sep 23, 2018, at 12:13 PM, Lucio De Re <lucio.d...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 9/23/18, Robert Engels <reng...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >> I take offense to that. I apologized for my statement that was worded more >> harshly than intended. But if you think that Go is beyond criticism just >> because of ??? Anything??? Go is a GREAT tool for many classes of >> applications, but it is certainly not appropriate for all use cases. Maybe >> with open criticism it could get there, but I don’t think your attitude will >> help it. I am certainly not the first nor the last to highlight many >> deficiencies in Gos design. That’s the great thing about software though, it >> is malleable. >> > I responded harshly, too and that wasn't necessary, so I owe everyone > an apology. > > But setting Java as the paragon for Go is not going to win anyone to > your cause, either. Java exists, it is available, it is what it is. > Why would Go want to resemble it? > > Lucio. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
