+1000 The most valuable comment in this thread IMO. Thank you.
четверг, 2 февраля 2017 г., 13:41:25 UTC+3 пользователь Axel Wagner написал: > > I want to re-emphasize that all of these are micro-benchmarks. They say > nothing useful at all, as proven by this thread; in some circumstances, the > added cost may be significant, in others it isn't. The same rule that has > been repeated lots of times on this list still applies: Write your program > to be simple and readable, *if* it is too slow, benchmark and improve. > Basing your code on what any of these Benchmarks says is just ridiculous, > base it on the bottlenecks you measure in your actual, real-world program > running on the actual production hardware with actual production data. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
