Thanks, I have already replied - would of saved you the typing trouble. As I pointed out, the lack of register prefixes (which would screen AT&T at me), was what really confused me.
> On Dec 14, 2018, at 4:09 PM, Ian Denhardt <i...@zenhack.net> wrote: > > If you pass `-M intel` to objdump it will display intel syntax. > > Quoting robert engels (2018-12-14 16:41:39) >> but the operands are backwards according to MOVQ on Intel, it >> should be >> dst,src >> SO, I'm thinking "intermediate code", so different syntax. Fine, but >> then when I use objdump or otool, the assembly still looks backwards, >> but matches the above. >> Is this because LLVM is also "backwards" ? > > It's not about intermediate code, Intel just uses different syntax than > both the Go and GNU assemblers, which are descendants (in tradition, if > not actual code) of the old AT&T assemblers. The AT&T syntax uses > src,dst. > >> It there anyway to get objdump or otool to output intel assembly that >> matches their documentation ? > > You can pass objdump `-M intel`. > > -Ian > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
