This is in the context of compiling Go to webassembly that will be used
with javascript.
*Currently:*
We have`syscall/js` which has stuff like this:
```go
js.Global().Get("document").Call("createElement", "div")
```
What it could be:
```go
js.document.createElement("div")
```
*Why?*
This would make writing stuff for webassembly WAY easier.
Auto-generating it would allow it to update definitions whenever the
standards
are updated. Which would make it easier to maintain.
Also, if there's going to be significant usage of
Go -> webassembly -> web browser and javascript
then having all the types and definitions auto-generated would save on tons
of boilerplate abstractions that people will inevitably create for their
own sanity.
Advantages:
- more natural to use
- more readable
- type safe
Disadvantages:
- less flexible
- when the APIs are updated, it might result in loss of
backwards-compatibility
*How?*
WebIDL --> Go source code
- https://www.w3.org/TR/WebIDL/
- https://heycam.github.io/webidl/
- https://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Core/idl-definitions.html
Technical reports published by the W3C that include programming language
> interfaces have typically been described using the Object Management
> Group’s Interface Definition Language (IDL) [OMGIDL]. The IDL provides a
> means to describe these interfaces in a language independent manner.
> Usually, additional language binding appendices are included in such
> documents which detail how the interfaces described with the IDL correspond
> to constructs in the given language.
https://www.w3.org/TR/WebIDL/#introduction
*A Possible Conversion:*
*From WebIDL:*
```
[Exposed=Window]
interface Paint { };
[Exposed=Window]
interface SolidColor : Paint {
attribute double red;
attribute double green;
attribute double blue;
};
[Exposed=Window]
interface Pattern : Paint {
attribute DOMString imageURL;
};
[Exposed=Window, Constructor]
interface GraphicalWindow {
readonly attribute unsigned long width;
readonly attribute unsigned long height;
attribute Paint currentPaint;
void drawRectangle(double x, double y, double width, double height);
void drawText(double x, double y, DOMString text);
};
```
Example From: https://heycam.github.io/webidl/
*To Go:*
This is probably not the best way to do it, but is an example of how it
might look.
type Paint struct {}
type SolidColor struct {
Red float64
Green float64
Blue float64
}
type GraphicalWindow struct {
width uint32
height uint32
CurrentPaint Paint
}
func (gw *GraphicalWindow) drawRectangle(x, y, width, height float64) {
// syscall
}
func (gw *GraphicalWindow) drawText(x, y float64, text string) {
// syscall
}
I know there are some existing examples of Go bindings for DOM,
but I don't think they are auto-generated from WebIDL,
Which I imagine would be easier to maintain in the long-run.
Anybody have thoughts on this?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
