I brought it up early on, wanting AND (&) and OR (|) as well as AND-ASSIGN (&=) and OR-ASSIGN (|=).
Not enthusiastic about shortcut operators on assignment form. Rob posted here that he was ok/open to the idea. On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 5:55 PM Caleb Spare <cesp...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sometimes when working with bools I wish I could write > > myBool &&= x > > rather than > > myBool = myBool && x > > I believe that && and || are the only binary operators in the language for > which the assignment form makes sense but doesn't exist (i.e., we have +=, > &^=, >>=, and so on). So in some sense adding these last two operators > would be symmetric and would make working with bools just as convenient as > working with integers, floats, bit fields, etc. > > Has this been discussed before? It's hard to search for this. > > Caleb > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- *Michael T. jonesmichael.jo...@gmail.com <michael.jo...@gmail.com>* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
