On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 1:56 PM Manlio Perillo <manlio.peri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The Go specification do use both implementation-dependent and > implementation-defined, and I assumed it was a typo. > But what is the difference between implementation-dependent and > implementation-defined?
I don't think they are used consistently. I see "implementation-defined" twice in the spec. It's clear that one of them just means "defined by the standard library implementation." The other means the same thing as "implementation-dependent" or "implementation-specific", both of which appear in the spec. > I think that the Go specification should have a glossary. Perhaps, though hopefully a very short one. The Go spec is intended to be as readable as possible, and have minimal standardese. Ian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
