I'm really liking in Go that I can easily pass bits of code around, 'closures'? Apologies if I have terminology wrong, since I'm new here.
For a typical asynchronous bit of code I like to pass in a 'func' for what to do with the result, and also a 'func' to handle any errors. I'm struggling to find a clean way to achieve a 'non-local return' i.e. return from these closures and return the enclosing function too. https://play.golang.org/p/_ANPXKRzibq I had a look at the plan9 assembly stuff, and starting to suspect that it's probably not possible? So I'm wondering how readable my attempt is. In Objective-C I would use named parameters here of 'thenDo' and 'elseDo' to help the readability. And I'm reluctant to try and duplicate that approach using a struct in Go. But I suppose it's the dangling return that I least like... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
