Hi Brad, This sounds *very* interesting.
We are currently building a product using Lorca ( https://github.com/zserge/lorca) but am worried that it is not mature and may never be, and that Chrome could change and disable to features that make it possible at any time. What are your plans for it? I would be really interested if it could become a commercial product so that I could have better confidence of it being supported. -Mike On Friday, March 29, 2019 at 12:39:42 AM UTC-4, Brad wrote: > > Now that WebAssembly is available as an (experimental) compilation target, > it raises the question of how feasible is it to make a quality UI library. > Vue (my personal fav) and React, while they have their issues, do have many > ideas which are good and seem like they may translate well over to > WebAssembly. > > Here's a working experimental Vue-like UI library with tools to write UI > components in .vugu files (similar in concept to .vue files): > https://github.com/vugu/vugu; Getting Started page: > http://www.vugu.org/doc/start > > HTML with logic in it gets code generated to .go files. In-browser > rendering in wasm with DOM sync as well as static HTML output are > implemented. > > And this is my cheesy bullet-pointed list that makes it sound a lot more > mature than it is: > > * Runs in-browser using WebAssembly > * Single-file components > * Vue-like markup syntax > * Write idiomatic Go code > * Rapid prototyping > * ~3 minute setup > * Standard Go build tools > > I'm curious what people think of the approach and ideas for improvement. > > --brad > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
