On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 9:17 AM Jan Mercl <0xj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 6:07 PM Jamil Djadala <djad...@datamax.bg> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 07:44:53 -0700 (PDT) > > peterGo <go.peter...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Cgo translates C types into equivalent unexported Go types. > > > https://golang.org/cmd/cgo/ > > > > > > But then, definition of new methods on non-local types is forbidden. > > Why it is enabled for cgo types ? > > Unexported type cannot be non-local. "C" is not an import path, it > denotes a pseudo package with special treatment.
That said, I have to agree that defining methods on types defined by cgo is never necessary and can only cause confusion. And cgo could report an error when it sees it. So please consider opening an issue to change cmd/cgo to issue an error for an attempt to define a method on a type defined in the C pseudo-package. Thanks. Ian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
