On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 4:05 PM Tong Sun <suntong...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yep, thanks Justin, both your points really made the difference,
> because I do believe that the buffered socket write is the key
> component for the 3-time improvement that I'm getting (from using
> FastHTTP), IMHO. And FastHTTP recommends GOMAXPROCS=1 too, which I
> used this time as well.
>
> So thanks again, Justin & Ronny!
>

Cool. Glad that actually helped. I do feel with your results, and in
agreement with others,  that you really are comparing Go to the underlying
C implementation of php, with everything stripped back so far. But at least
you are happy with your results!


> On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 10:54 PM Justin Israel <justinisr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm wondering about a couple factors in this comparison that seem to
> make a difference in my local test:
> >
> > I think perl sockets are write buffered. So would the equivalent be to
> wrap the net.Conn in bufio.NewWriter(c) and flush before the Close?
> > Since this is a straigh-line test where both servers are not using
> concurrent handling of connections (uncommon for a Go server even on 1
> core), would it not make sense to run the Go server with GOMAXPROCS=1?
> >
> > - Justin
> >
> > On Saturday, June 8, 2019 at 1:36:49 AM UTC+12, Tong Sun wrote:
> >>
> >> I had always believed that the web projects build with Go should be
> much faster than Perl, since Go is a compiled language.
> >>
> >> However that belief was crushed brutally last night, when I did a
> comparison -- the Go implementation is 8 times worse than the Perl! -- the
> mean response time jumped from 6ms to 48ms.
> >>
> >> I know this is the simplest possible web server, but still, when it
> comes to simple web servers like this, I have to say that Perl performs
> much better than Go.
> >>
> >> I don't think there is much I can twist on the Go side, since it can't
> be more simpler than that. However, I also believe it won't hurt to ask and
> confirm. So,
> >>
> >> Have I missed anything? Is it possible for me to make my Go
> implementation anywhere near the Perl's performance?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "golang-nuts" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/golang-nuts/iH2Ck_hpCpI/unsubscribe.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/37a1ac7e-85ee-4775-b348-5673c41a162c%40googlegroups.com
> .
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAPGFgA2_oz-Frmw13oraLoeyzidwy_r4yWUfPNuqFFKefgG6DQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to