Is there any plans on open sourcing go.dev (the webservices behind it). It is a little bit odd, but I'll personally learn a lot from it.
Oh, and congrats on the great work. I really liked it so much and would definitely use it a lot over godoc. Regards, M On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 12:00 PM Dan Kortschak <d...@kortschak.io> wrote: > Yes. This is my exact concern. > > This has two impacts, one is the non-discoverability and the other is a > possibility of misapprehension that the packages are in fact non- > licensed which is an actual harm to the packages. The irony is that we > have gone to excessive lengths to ensure that all our original sources > have their licenses represented as well. > > On Thu, 2019-11-14 at 10:56 +0100, Jan Mercl wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 5:55 AM Dan Kortschak <d...@kortschak.io> > > wrote: > > > > > It looks like license detection needs work. > > > > > > See https://pkg.go.dev/gonum.org/v1/gonum?tab=overview and note it > > > has > > > a BSD 3 clause, as shown by GitHub's assessment (just above the > > > "Clone > > > or download" button) at https://github.com/gonum/gonum and the > > > LICENSE > > > file that it links to. > > > > Moreover, such packages seem to be, as a side effect, non- > > discoverable > > because their README and documentation are not indexed (nor > > displayed). For example, searching for `pure go SQL database' has > > zero > > results. > > > > I don't care about automatic license recognizing, even though it's > > admittedly a useful information for the site user. But I don't > > understand why projects with unrecognized LICENSE file contents don't > > show the README and the documentation. > > > > I'll better leave the fact of hiding even the LICENSE file per se > > from > > the user with the message `“Licenses” hidden due to license > > restrictions.` without comment because I guess it's just a legal > > issue > > I don't understand. > > > > Any yes, all my packages that I tried are victims to the above > > issues. > > Here's an example of a recognized LICENSE vs an unrecognized one: > > > > jnml@e5-1650:~/src/modernc.org/mathutil> diff -u ~/goroot/LICENSE > > LICENSE > > --- /home/jnml/goroot/LICENSE 2019-09-10 14:24:54.469859557 +0200 > > +++ LICENSE 2019-09-10 14:36:43.347068286 +0200 > > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > > -Copyright (c) 2009 The Go Authors. All rights reserved. > > +Copyright (c) 2014 The mathutil Authors. All rights reserved. > > > > Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without > > modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions > > are > > @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ > > copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following > > disclaimer > > in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the > > distribution. > > - * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its > > + * Neither the names of the authors nor the names of the > > contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from > > this software without specific prior written permission. > > > > jnml@e5-1650:~/src/modernc.org/mathutil> > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/7b8e08bb8429ac6b245458b33df597b783e0180b.camel%40kortschak.io > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAHrL7wENOSm0kWkQojDnbdM%2B27o1a0B%2Bw4rthMUoamsPrEvFdw%40mail.gmail.com.
