On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 1:24 PM Alexander Mills <alexander.d.mi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I put the question on Quora: > https://www.quora.com/unanswered/In-Golang-mustdo-means-it-will-panic-if-it-cannot-be-done-Is-here-a-naming-convention-for-will-always-return-error-if-it-cannot-be-done > > In Golang "mustdo" means it will panic() if it cannot be done. Is here a > naming convention for "will always return error" if it cannot be done?
Maybe I'm missing something, but isn't that the expected behavior for any function that has a result of type error? I don't see why we would need a naming convention for that. Ian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAOyqgcX06wo3j0kE%3D2j_0AC29--zkF0mjATSUdMr5LZOamEsjg%40mail.gmail.com.
