I wrote some very efficient math software in Go. To accomplish my goals, I used make and awk programs that generate assembly code tuned to the exact demands of command line make configuration. Then it builds in go, then runs.
This is not mainstream, but has worked well since Go 1.0. It never seemed to me that it was something everyone needs, so that means it being “worse” for me but simpler for a million others might be a reasonable trade off. Is there anything of this kind at play here? Can it not be done perfectly using m4, or cpp, or ... On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 11:21 AM Brian Candler <b.cand...@pobox.com> wrote: > Sorry, somehow I scrolled over the definition of func #gettext. So: this > function emits literal source code text to be inserted into the compilation > point. > > There are interesting semantic implications here: the args can't be > evaluated at compile time (unless they are constant expressions), but need > to be passed as strings representing the expression plus a type. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/5024a878-1392-4f1e-ac48-799f0cf5eee8%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/5024a878-1392-4f1e-ac48-799f0cf5eee8%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- *Michael T. jonesmichael.jo...@gmail.com <michael.jo...@gmail.com>* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CALoEmQyo3D10Tut9nJ10m3p3sJ9fExH9KxWOYWJj9_%2B-itDV1g%40mail.gmail.com.
