Hi, The type parameters in the current proposal uses `(type xxx)` which is visually hard to distinguish from function parameters.
There are reasons stated in the proposal to not adopt <> (which is common in other languages) which I'm not going to challenge. But have you considered `(<T>)`? It should eliminate the infinite lookahead concern of using <>, require minimal change to the existing implementation in go2go, and IMO improves the readability of Go code w/ generics. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/8c23b598-5b67-4ca3-a736-ea18fa4060e8o%40googlegroups.com.
