+1. I found the new draft readable and in practice it feels quite natural.
My hope was always that generics would "feel like Go".
On Tuesday, June 23, 2020 at 12:34:30 PM UTC-4 Haddock wrote:
> Also big +1 from my side and kudos to Ian for always answering to this
> storm of objections and suggestions with patience and objectiveness
>
>
> Am Freitag, 19. Juni 2020 04:17:16 UTC+2 schrieb Michael Jones:
>>
>> I doubt this will help, but I have to try...
>>
>> Really smart and accomplished people have worked for a year to refine the
>> generics approach--as the impressive updated design draft and the scholarly
>> FeatherweightGo paper both demonstrate. The design is accompanied with
>> tools to allow development and experience by any interested Go developer.
>> This is marvelous. Thank you Go team and helpers!
>>
>> Let's post about substantial things in the design ("generic type switch
>> necessary at day one" maybe, whatever) and not only about parenthesis. I'm
>> going crazy here seeing all the comments about that. I mean, think of how
>> hard they are working on this; parenthesis posts read like *More Cowbell
>> *to me.
>>
>> Sorry for the outburst,
>> Michael
>>
>> P.S. I challenge you to fully read the Featherweight Go paper and the
>> design draft, as I did, and then come away thinking about the expression of
>> the idea rather than the idea. I just can't comprehend it -- it is the
>> ideas that hold power and beauty, that will transform our daily work.
>>
>> --
>>
>> *Michael T. jonesmichae...@gmail.com*
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/8b476021-c0e3-4a4c-a801-f1ec62558f1cn%40googlegroups.com.
