On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 10:52 AM David Riley <fraveyd...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Also, to this specific point: this exact approach, as with much of Go,
> embodies the Bell Labs approach to design (for better or for worse, and
> with good reason).  Sometimes we have to live with the artifacts of
> evolution.

One interesting counterexample here is the GC and scheduler, which take on
a huge amount of complexity in the implementation to create a dead-simple
interface. It seems like Go is willing to take a worse-is-better approach
when the amount of interface complexity is relatively small.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 

Reply via email to