Apologies for replying to an old post.
But I am sometimes a bit slow in reading my messages.

I too think that errcheck's is a bit severe in its treatment of deferred 
calls to Close().

So I forked the code and changed the behaviour to be more permissive.

Feel free to use it.

- amnon

On Wednesday, 16 August 2017 13:05:39 UTC+1, Gert wrote:
> To pass errcheck I need to do something like
> defer func() { _ = resp.Body.Close() }()
> instead of 
> defer resp.Body.Close()
> Is this something the errcheck tool can figure out to mark as valid 
> instead or does the errcheck tool need help from the compiler so the second 
> case is also ok?

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 

Reply via email to