On Tue, 2020-07-14 at 23:53 -0700, Randall O'Reilly wrote: > So, essentially, this puts the onus back on the parser programmers to > definitively *rule out* the use of < > -- is it really that difficult > / costly to do a bit of look-ahead and disambiguate the different use > cases?
The absence of arbitrary look-ahead was from memory one of the early design intentions of the language. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/877ac181f9325169b145e156b2a04df0c7866559.camel%40kortschak.io.
