On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 6:38 AM Jan Mercl <0xj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > FTR: Popular vote also demands exceptions or hidden execution control > for errors, operator overloading and other things that IMO Go avoided > intentionally. Because there's no good reason to have just yet another > Java/C++/you-name-it programming language.
I don't think this is accurate. Surveys express a clear and consistent desire for generics that is far ahead of requests for operator overloading or other language features. (To avoid misunderstanding I'll say again that changes to the Go language are not driven by polls.) Ian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAOyqgcUKg6VYHVXi672RbghN4XzEqKC5qtF%2B6t_DCmXEBXDpcg%40mail.gmail.com.
