On Tuesday, January 5, 2021 at 1:29:01 PM UTC-5 Brian Candler wrote:
> On Tuesday, 5 January 2021 at 18:17:14 UTC tapi...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> What about if the custom generic function syntax is consistent with built
>> ones?
>> For example:
>>
>> v := MakeMyMap(mymap[T1]T2)
>>
>
> Would this be mandatory for all generics which take two or more types? It
> seems unbalanced to me. Not everything is a hash-like container with a key
> and value.
>
> Silly example:
>
> func blah[T1]T2 (x T1) T2 { ... }
>
> x := blah[int]string(123)
>
I didn't see anyone propose this syntax from the above comments.
>
> I think the current draft is clearer:
>
> func blah[T1, T2] (x T1) T2 { ... }
>
> x := blah[int, string](123)
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/236996ef-a872-4fcc-90ab-0c80722d953cn%40googlegroups.com.
