On Fri, Mar 19, 2021, 4:54 AM Space A. <reexist...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2. Sure, Ian has revealed how that "consensus" was measured. By counting > "thumbs up", "thumbs down" and "confused" emojis. So Go is not driven by > polls, it's driven by emojis. >
For the record, this statement is false. That is not what I said and it is not what I meant. Ian > > чт, 18 мар. 2021 г. в 23:22, Tyler Compton <xavi...@gmail.com>: > >> I think we all want to stick our noses in this thread. I'm going to stick >> my nose in it too :) >> >> Space, I don't think you'll ever be happy as a result of this discussion, >> no matter what evidence or arguments others provide you. I think the fact >> is that you were burned by the outcome of the generics proposal. You didn't >> have the time to review the draft proposal and engage with the discussion >> early, and you disagree with the resulting outcome. That's unfortunate and >> I'm sorry it happened. I hope you don't feel that people are trying to >> convince you that you weren't burned. Nothing feels worse than having your >> concerns trivialized. >> >> However, you have to understand that just because you were burned doesn't >> mean that those around you making these decisions are bad actors. There are >> probably small ways that this process could have been improved, but I don't >> think they would have changed the outcome. The reality is that after many >> iterations, the Go team created a proposal that a large enough number of Go >> users found beneficial for it to be accepted. I know you disagree with >> them, but our responsibility as members of this community is to >> exercise our right to disagree without resorting to attacks on character. I >> hope I've been able to address your concerns and disagree with you without >> making you feel I'm attacking your character. >> >> To those who are still attempting to provide evidence that the generics >> proposal process was conducted in good faith, I think you've done >> everything you need to do and it's probably best to just let this one go. >> >> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 7:08 AM Space A. <reexist...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Since pro-generics ppl here are struggling to provide any evidence of >>> existence of open and public discussion on the topic of dropping generics, >>> I will do it myself. >>> >>> Here is it: >>> https://groups.google.com/g/golang-nuts/c/LEEuJPOg0oo/m/-EZp3YSeBQAJ >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "golang-nuts" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/d8b96595-effe-4eed-898d-1c4e183189dbn%40googlegroups.com >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/d8b96595-effe-4eed-898d-1c4e183189dbn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CADKwOTfxsjhAwA05hdwSo_hGU0WqX1qPRwC5J_Kb5mH5iKCZHA%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CADKwOTfxsjhAwA05hdwSo_hGU0WqX1qPRwC5J_Kb5mH5iKCZHA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAOyqgcWMnHU9wEgfYjSEQgnoC_i5qfs0ogt4SFfjYrRkbkGtoQ%40mail.gmail.com.
