On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 8:26 PM Pure White <wu.purewh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think this is a good idea. But I suppose this will meet the same problem I > have met ---- syscall package is outside of the runtime.
We can introduce hooks into the runtime that are only for the standard library, because we know exactly how they will be used. Ian > 在2021年4月28日星期三 UTC+8 上午12:54:25<Michael Pratt> 写道： >> >> I'm not sure if calling through the VDSO is the best solution to this >> specific issue, though it does sound like a case that would certainly >> benefit. >> >> Regardless, one fairly clean way we could support this would be to make >> x/sys/unix.ClockGettime (and Gettimeofday) call through the VDSO rather than >> performing the syscall. That is always a valid operation (the VDSO will make >> the syscall if it doesn't support the specific options passed), and I think >> would solve this problem without even changing the API. It seems we don't do >> that already for simplicity of implementation and prior lack of need. >> >> On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 12:13 PM Ian Lance Taylor <ia...@golang.org> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 27, 2021, 8:55 AM Manlio Perillo <manlio....@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Il giorno martedì 27 aprile 2021 alle 17:51:46 UTC+2 Ian Lance Taylor ha >>>> scritto: >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 7:43 AM Manlio Perillo <manlio....@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > Il giorno lunedì 26 aprile 2021 alle 10:24:09 UTC+2 Pure White ha >>>>> > scritto: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> So I really want to know what is the right way to do vdso call outside >>>>> >> runtime? >>>>> >> >>>>> > What about using a different function instead of time.Now, and using >>>>> > RawSyscall? >>>>> >>>>> That wouldn't be a VDSO call. VDSO calls are in general faster than >>>>> system calls. There is more background at >>>>> https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/vdso.7.html. >>>>> >>>>> Ian >>>> >>>> >>>> Yes, that wouldn't a VDSO call. But since a VDSO call will require cgo , >>>> maybe RawSyscall will be more efficient? >>> >>> >>> The meaningful comparison is to time.Now, which uses VDSO. I suppose it is >>> possible that RawSyscall of clock_gettime with a coarse clock would be >>> faster than time.Now, but I would be surprised. >>> >>> Ian >>> >>> -- >>> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "golang-nuts" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to golang-nuts...@googlegroups.com. >>> >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAOyqgcX9mfSFq5gucrTCi0PJyVdLzA2xGXNByDeOGOyaFLo1hA%40mail.gmail.com. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/a57afc3e-a91a-4564-b540-dce9ff0e2429n%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAOyqgcWhmvpWoV5k0BhKsSfPAoS_MuprZzbjEqAjHvM0OhZb_g%40mail.gmail.com.
