On Sunday, May 30, 2021 at 12:54:02 PM UTC-4 axel.wa...@googlemail.com 
wrote:

> That is very normal for micro-benchmarks on a ns scale.
>

The results are so constantly that I think it is more related to CPU cache 
and the specified directives.
 

>
> On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 6:07 PM tapi...@gmail.com <tapi...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>
>> It is some strange that if any of the bool/byte/int16/int64 benchmarks is 
>> removed in this test file https://play.golang.org/p/w29J9VhtzYH,
>> then the benchmark result is like:
>>
>> Benchmark_CopyStruct_3_fields-4       1000000000             0.7780 ns/op
>> Benchmark_CopyStruct_4_fields-4       1000000000             0.7513 ns/op
>>
>> Otherwise, it is like:
>>
>> Benchmark_CopyStruct_3_fields-4       1000000000             1.501 ns/op
>> Benchmark_CopyStruct_4_fields-4       1000000000             0.7755 ns/op
>>
>> In other words, it looks there is mutual interference between benchmarks.
>>
>> On Saturday, May 29, 2021 at 11:49:47 PM UTC-4 tapi...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> The benchmark code: https://play.golang.org/p/bC1zO14eNeh
>>>
>>> The result:
>>>
>>> $ go test -bench=. 
>>> goos: linux
>>> goarch: amd64
>>> pkg: example.com/valuecopy
>>> cpu: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3210M CPU @ 2.50GHz
>>> Benchmark_CopyBool-4                    1000000000             0.8885 
>>> ns/op
>>> Benchmark_CopyByte-4                    1000000000             0.8872 
>>> ns/op
>>> Benchmark_CopyInt16-4                   1000000000             0.8785 
>>> ns/op
>>> Benchmark_CopyInt32-4                   1000000000             0.8854 
>>> ns/op
>>> Benchmark_CopyInt64-4                   1000000000             0.8831 
>>> ns/op
>>> Benchmark_CopyPointer-4                 911733464             1.330 ns/op
>>> Benchmark_CopyString-4                  901249356             1.325 ns/op
>>> Benchmark_CopySlice-4                   664187247             1.765 ns/op
>>> Benchmark_CopyArray_2_elements-4        1000000000             0.8874 
>>> ns/op
>>> Benchmark_CopyArray_3_elements-4        1000000000             1.096 
>>> ns/op
>>> Benchmark_CopyArray_4_elements-4        1000000000             1.105 
>>> ns/op
>>> Benchmark_CopyArray_5_elements-4        534542524             2.202 ns/op
>>> Benchmark_CopyArray_6_elements-4        727849554             1.606 ns/op
>>> Benchmark_CopyArray_7_elements-4        444494692             2.649 ns/op
>>> Benchmark_CopyArray_8_elements-4        584854867             1.993 ns/op
>>> Benchmark_CopyArray_9_elements-4        389639859             3.083 ns/op
>>> Benchmark_CopyArray_10_elements-4       267380602             4.418 ns/op
>>> Benchmark_CopyArray_11_elements-4       242644033             4.867 ns/op
>>> Benchmark_CopyArray_12_elements-4       268304104             4.498 ns/op
>>> Benchmark_CopyArray_13_elements-4       82165272            14.46 ns/op
>>> Benchmark_CopyStruct_2_fields-4         1000000000             0.5029 
>>> ns/op
>>> Benchmark_CopyStruct_3_fields-4         671136589             1.769 ns/op
>>> Benchmark_CopyStruct_4_fields-4         1000000000             0.8785 
>>> ns/op
>>> Benchmark_CopyStruct_5_fields-4         530876049             2.202 ns/op
>>> Benchmark_CopyStruct_6_fields-4         723380257             1.581 ns/op
>>> Benchmark_CopyStruct_7_fields-4         444619906             2.636 ns/op
>>> Benchmark_CopyStruct_8_fields-4         588605260             1.968 ns/op
>>> Benchmark_CopyStruct_9_fields-4         387253551             3.073 ns/op
>>> Benchmark_CopyStruct_10_fields-4        267450452             4.396 ns/op
>>> Benchmark_CopyStruct_11_fields-4        246289522             4.855 ns/op
>>> Benchmark_CopyStruct_12_fields-4        266212528             4.426 ns/op
>>> Benchmark_CopyStruct_13_fields-4        207298701             5.739 ns/op
>>>
>>> From the benchmark result, it looks 
>>> * the cost of copying a [13]int value is much larger than copying a 
>>> [12]int value.
>>> * the cost of copying a struct{a, b, c int} value is about double of 
>>> copying a struct{a, b, c, d int} value. 
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "golang-nuts" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to golang-nuts...@googlegroups.com.
>>
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/f53a8f05-37a6-4c86-87c1-de9e83f381fdn%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/f53a8f05-37a6-4c86-87c1-de9e83f381fdn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/6caafbc0-66f3-4b77-ac92-6174b17ebf30n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to