@Brian, We did not try that as the issue is happening with go 1.13.7 as well

On Thu, 9 Sep, 2021, 10:48 pm Brian Candler, <b.cand...@pobox.com> wrote:

> Just a random thought, but have you tried 1.16
> with GODEBUG=asyncpreemptoff=1 ?  The preemptive scheduling stuff was
> introduced in 1.14 I believe.
>
> On Thursday, 9 September 2021 at 16:28:38 UTC+1 varun...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> @Kurtis, Thanks for the reply.
>>
>> Yes. We upgraded to 1.16.5 due to this issue and had to revert back to
>> 1.13.7 (over earlier working version) as we are frequently seeing these
>> errors in 1.16.5.
>>
>> I looked into all the related issues on golang forums. We are not on
>> NetBSD (We are on CentOS7.8)
>>
>> We also suspect it is a bug in CGO code (specifically some memory
>> violation) but finding the bug is like finding needle in a haystack. The
>> SIGSEGV CGO signal handler did not catch anything at the time of this
>> error. The error message by itself does not mention any thing debuggable.
>> There is no stack or core dump. We tried working with GOTRACEBACK but that
>> did not generate any core dump as well.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Varun
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, September 9, 2021 at 8:07:00 PM UTC+5:30 Kurtis Rader wrote:
>>
>>> Googling "go morestack on gsignal" turns up quite a few reports. Some of
>>> which involved kernel bugs (e.g.,
>>> https://github.com/golang/go/issues/19652) but most seem to involve
>>> SIGSEGV errors in non-kernel code; sometimes the Go runtime or stdlib
>>> (e.g., https://github.com/golang/go/issues/35235) and sometimes user
>>> code. Given that you're using CGO a likely explanation is a bug in your C
>>> code. However, you say you're using Go 1.13.7 which is getting long in the
>>> tooth. Are you sure you're seeing the same failure with Go 1.16.5? If yes
>>> then I would bet the bug is in your C code. If no then it could be a Go bug
>>> that has likely already been fixed.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 4:15 AM varun...@gmail.com <varun...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Minor update:
>>>>
>>>> a. The crash with "morestack on gsignal" happens to be independent of
>>>> the kernel versions mentioned earlier
>>>> b. We implemented a signal handler to catch SIGSEGV from CGO. That is
>>>> not helping either
>>>> c. From system audit logs, we can see the following message:
>>>>
>>>> ./audit/audit.log.2:22944:type=ANOM_ABEND
>>>> msg=audit(1630376735.155:5486532): auid=4294967295 uid=996 gid=994
>>>> ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:unconfined_service_t:s0 pid=26422
>>>> comm="indexer" reason="memory violation" sig=5
>>>>
>>>> Sig=5 is SIGTRAP. At this point, we suspect there is a SIGSEGV in CGO
>>>> layer and that is being returned as SIGTRAP by runtime.
>>>>
>>>> I am still clueless as to why a process can crash with "morestack on
>>>> gsignal".  Any pointers to debug this further would be of great help.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Varun
>>>> On Wednesday, September 1, 2021 at 2:44:52 PM UTC+5:30
>>>> varun...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> Recently we have been seeing multiple occurrences of "fatal: morestack
>>>>> on gsignal" error in our system tests. The issue happens with golang 
>>>>> 1.13.7
>>>>> and golang 1.16.5 runtimes. The process restarts after this error and no
>>>>> stack trace is dumped. Our process uses CGO calls, I/O ops etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> So far, the issue seem to happen only on CentOS7 with linux kernel
>>>>> version: 3.10.0-1127.19.1.el7.x86_64. The issue is not seen on:
>>>>> 3.10.0-693.5.2.el7.x86_64
>>>>>
>>>>> At this point, we have no clue as to why this is happening and no
>>>>> stack trace is making it difficult to debug. Any pointers on debugging the
>>>>> issue would be of great help.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Varun
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "golang-nuts" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to golang-nuts...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/9f36ab30-3222-4eed-8388-93ecd259bf55n%40googlegroups.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/9f36ab30-3222-4eed-8388-93ecd259bf55n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Kurtis Rader
>>> Caretaker of the exceptional canines Junior and Hank
>>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "golang-nuts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/golang-nuts/msVmzxWjIOI/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/4e6c8f7d-86be-4ecf-b4f5-19554f3d1379n%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/4e6c8f7d-86be-4ecf-b4f5-19554f3d1379n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAMzZVzBrwcw%2BMJOjvXgg_YhFA0ZgYD%3DiLhYJyYHCxzXFKYD%2BeQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to