> > Should it be possible to write a type constraint that would allow me to > eliminate this projection function parameter, and instead have the compiler > mandate and ensure that for a given type E, the related type *E > implements Object? >
I realized that this desire may be addressed by the *No way to express convertibility* section <https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/refs/heads/master/design/43651-type-parameters.md#no-way-to-express-convertibility> of the *Type Parameters Proposal* document. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/2072c284-66b9-4a81-adb4-f5635c0ab49en%40googlegroups.com.
