On Tuesday, 21 June 2022 at 21:19:29 UTC+1 tsvihb...@gmail.com wrote:

> I'm now realizing that even that wouldn't fully behave as I wanted because 
> it doesn't account for nil values, so I'll have to figure out a better 
> solution.


For a "Maybe" type specifically, the nil interface value could serve as 
your "None" value:
https://go.dev/play/p/7mBiKbMkE4b

For other union types, it's possible to use generics own union types, with 
a trick:
https://go.dev/play/p/BKW7OQsUP5U

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/0db369fb-2daf-42a4-b4aa-bb67c96faeebn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to