I guess I need to clarify what I was trying to say here - golang 1.17+ 
claims that TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 is more secure than 
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 CBC-SHA256 doesn't have any 
countermeasures against Lucky13, but all of the SSL tools: testssl.sh, 
SSLLabs, etc. claim the other way around because of ECDHE.

So in intentionally handling the cipher ordering, it seems like this change 
unintentionally made things less secure, at least according to several 
other reputable security resources. Who's correct here?

On Thursday, August 25, 2022 at 1:30:11 PM UTC-7 Diana Tuck wrote:

> Yes, I'm aware it's intentional, but it causes a lower security grade on 
> SSLLabs <https://ssllabs.com/>.
>
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 1:20 PM 'Sean Liao' via golang-nuts <
> golan...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
>> This is intentional, see https://go.dev/issue/45430
>>
>> - sean
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2022, 19:07 'Diana Tuck' via golang-nuts <
>> golan...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Since upgrading to 1.17 in which the cipher order is determined by the 
>>> golang lib, clients that previously negotiated with more secure ciphers are 
>>> now using less secure ciphers. 
>>>
>>> We see that Windows 7 and 8 clients can no longer negotiate using xc027 
>>> and are instead using 0x9c, which is lower in both of their preference 
>>> order.
>>>
>>> On 1.16, using testssl.sh, for example:
>>>
>>>  IE 11 Win 7         TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH 
>>> (P-256)
>>>  IE 11 Win 8.1       TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH 
>>> (P-256)
>>>  IE 11 Win Phone 8.1 TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH 
>>> (P-256)
>>>  IE 11 Win 10        TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384, 256 bit ECDH 
>>> (P-256)
>>>
>>> And since upgrading to 1.17 (and 1.18):
>>>
>>> IE 11 Win 7         TLSv1.2 AES128-GCM-SHA256, No FS
>>> IE 11 Win 8.1       TLSv1.2 AES128-GCM-SHA256, No FS
>>> IE 11 Win Phone 8.1 TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
>>> IE 11 Win 10        TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH 
>>> (P-256)
>>>
>>> Win 7 
>>> <https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/viewClient.html?name=IE&version=11&platform=Win%207&key=95>
>>>  and 
>>> Win 8.1 
>>> <https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/viewClient.html?name=IE&version=11&platform=Win%208.1&key=134>
>>>  prefer 
>>> 0xc027 over 0x9c, but now both negotiate using 0x9c.
>>>
>>> We could theoretically solve this by removing 0x9c from our supported 
>>> cipher suites to force the selection of 0xc027, but  unfortunately we 
>>> need to keep supporting these older clients.
>>>
>>> I wanted to check here to see if anyone has any suggestions before 
>>> filing a bug, because in my opinion, the client cipher suite order 
>>> preference should be honored at the very least even if the server 
>>> preference is no longer honored.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "golang-nuts" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to golang-nuts...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/726cacb3-ddf3-4602-8455-4eae9889f236n%40googlegroups.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/726cacb3-ddf3-4602-8455-4eae9889f236n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> -- 
>>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
>> Google Groups "golang-nuts" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/golang-nuts/EqtkbU9nXHE/unsubscribe.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
>> golang-nuts...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAGabyPrJ56%3DPd0Du1ooVd9dx-CA3N%3DNkHN46OaHfFTC7S%2B_x1A%40mail.gmail.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAGabyPrJ56%3DPd0Du1ooVd9dx-CA3N%3DNkHN46OaHfFTC7S%2B_x1A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Thank you,
>
> Diana Tuck
> Software Engineer
> +1 (919) 270-9838 <(919)%20270-9838>
> diana...@elastic.co
>
> <https://www.elastic.co/>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/7384e49b-bf7e-4343-b0a9-fa5503cc9905n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to