I didn't say Java didn't have late binding, but that it didn't have late
binding of every possible type (the "all things" in Kay's quote).

On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 10:25 AM Robert Engels <reng...@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:

> Why do you say that Java does not have late binding. It 100% does. In fact
> the JVM supports dynamic dispatch to make this as efficient as possible.
> Then the JIT optimizes it even more based on runtime behavior.
>
> On Nov 22, 2022, at 10:18 AM, Matt KØDVB <m...@k0dvb.com> wrote:
>
> 
> But see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self_(programming_language)
>
> Self was considered an OO language back when I was a grad student and is
> still listed that way today, even though it has neither classes nor
> inheritance.
>
> Anyway, my point would be that the term OO originates with Alan Kay and
> the team at Xerox PARC; Kay’s response to the OO flame wars was to
> de-emphasize classes and inheritance.
>
> Of course, using his definition, neither Java nor Go would be “truly” OO
> since not all things use late binding :-)
>
> Perhaps we can talk about class-based and non-class based OO languages?
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 10:07 AM Robert Engels <reng...@ix.netcom.com>
> wrote:
>
>> The wiki OO page lists classes as a requirement - but not necessarily
>> inheritance. Class variables require classes.
>>
>> Also, your link does not work.
>>
>> > On Nov 22, 2022, at 9:56 AM, Jan Mercl <0xj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 4:43 PM Robert Engels <reng...@ix.netcom.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Go is not listed as an OO language on Wikipedia.
>> >
>> > Check https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go_(programming_language):
>> > "ParadigmMulti-paradigm: concurrent imperative, object-oriented[1][2]"
>> >
>> >> Personally I think it is OO-like. OO typically has inheritance.
>> >
>> > Typically they may, but that's not the same as what a requirement
>> > would be, right?
>> >
>> >> There are also no “class variables” - only package level - which makes
>> some encapsulation patterns harder (every class has to become a package).
>> >
>> > No class has to become a package because Go has no classes. You may
>> > think of what a "class" in Go means, but you have not defined that
>> > idea and the language specification is somehow silent about Go
>> > classes.
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "golang-nuts" group.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>> an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> > To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAA40n-U%3DG8gqAZEHrnLUxbg5vsAcRkNV35c86c79xcrhSzLSWw%40mail.gmail.com
>> .
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "golang-nuts" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/A1F03B77-7CDC-46CC-B2E0-2C3C1B7DC966%40ix.netcom.com
>> .
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Matt
> K0DVB
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "golang-nuts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CANRS-2%2Bre6WUFT6tE8QinUZ-ipqLvwNTr2hoHNiD4H%3DwQ8T7HA%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CANRS-2%2Bre6WUFT6tE8QinUZ-ipqLvwNTr2hoHNiD4H%3DwQ8T7HA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>

-- 

Matt
K0DVB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CANRS-2%2Bmh04pZ_azKuknUe0%3DtVJE4JS_ZZV%2BjBijS%2BCBcQOOaQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to