I think this qualifies:
mux9p, Fazlul Shahriar's port of Russ' 9pserve (plan9port)
https://github.com/fhs/mux9p/search?q=clientIO

I've used this dispatcher pattern:
func dispatcher(commands chan Cmd, reporting chan Stats, worker Worker) {
  control = make(chan ...)
  counts = make(chan ...)
  timer = time.Tick( ... )
  go worker.Work(control, counts)
  for {
    select {
    case v, ok := <- counts:
        // collect samples
    case reporting <- Stats{ stats }:
    case <-timer:
       // calculate stats from samples
     case cmd, ok := <-commands:
       // reset counters, restart worker, exit, etc.
    }
  }
}


On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 8:44 PM Nigel Tao <nigel...@golang.org> wrote:
>
> I'm working on a multi-threaded C++ project. We have the equivalent of
> Go's channels, and are considering whether we also need to implement
> the equivalent of Go's select.
>
> Does anyone have interesting, non-trivial examples of a Go select
> statement in real code?
>
> By non-trivial, I mean that a lot of the selects that I've seen have
> exactly two cases, one of them doing "real work" and the other being
> either (1) "default" or (2) a timeout/cancel channel (e.g.
> ctx.Done()).
>
> In our C++ API, our channel send/recv methods already have
> try_send/try_recv equivalents for (1) and a timeout/cancel mechanism
> for (2).
>
> bcmills' "Rethinking Classical
> Concurrency Patterns"
> (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nPdvhB0PutEJzdCq5ms6UI58dp50fcAN/view)
> uses select to implement higher level ResourcePool / WorkerPool APIs
> but select is arguably a private implementation detail. While it might
> not be as beautiful under the hood, I think we can already present
> similar APIs using C++'s std::counting_semaphore.
>
> r's "A Concurrent Window System"
> (https://swtch.com/~rsc/thread/cws.pdf) discusses select'ing from
> separate window, keyboard and mouse channels but this could arguably
> instead be a single channel of heterogenous elements (e.g. in C++, a
> std::variant).
>
> It's more interesting to select over both input and output channels,
> and output channels may become "ready to communicate" without new
> input. But again, it may be possible to work around that by downstream
> actors sending "I'm ready to receive" events onto the upstream actor's
> heterogenous input channel.
>
> The most interesting selects I have so far is the
> golang.org/x/net/http2 source code, whose internals have a bit of a
> learning curve. If anyone has other examples, please share.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "golang-nuts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAOeFMNWBtuEci9oPUFNa0v0gDC%3DV6Xb0N05Jyxo%3DxN2ywJALGA%40mail.gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAJSxfmLUntfusLYko%2By2jhkMKOjmmd1wvaKozOcvJS8M%3D30hZw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to