Well, reflection is one of the things I love in language and it is a "must". On the other hand, the automation is exactly what common libraries do, I can not find any reason to make a loops if they are repeated actions which might be implemented in general library. array_intersect is a common example of automation. It makes no sense to right it again and again as it is common operation which works the same way. On Sunday, June 22, 2014 at 12:08:50 AM UTC+3 Milan P. Stanic wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-06-20 at 04:57, Larry Clapp wrote: > > I don't know PHP, but from what I've seen of it, it looks a lot like > Perl. > > I know Perl fairly well. > > > > One of the key differences between Perl and Go (and possibly PHP and Go) > is > > that Go has structs and Perl has only hashes (as far as named data > > structures)[1]. It's very important to not try to write Perl in Go (i.e. > > duplicating your Perl hashes in Go hashes, etc), but write more native, > > idiomatic Go, that takes full advantage of Go's structs and other native > > data structures. > > From my PoV main difference is that the Go is strongly typed while most > 'scripting' languages (Perl, PHP, Python etc.) are untyped (weak typed > or whatever) and I don't like to argue what typing means). > [...] > > -- > Best regards > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/efbffb73-7ef1-43aa-bac0-07bde66ddbf4n%40googlegroups.com.
