> On Jan 15, 2025, at 2:38 AM, 'Dan Kortschak' via golang-nuts 
> <golang-nuts@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 2025-01-15 at 02:33 -0500, Mike Schinkel wrote:
>> When you say compatibility, what would be a use-case where existing
>> code would break?  Something related to using reflection that expect
>> the exact signature?
> 
> For example https://go.dev/play/p/MLT3byjtGRJ

Thank you.  

So it seems the issue is the need to instantiate generic functions vs. a type 
compatibility issue if type casts to derived-from types could be automatic for 
those same functions.

-Mike

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/25F95E77-670E-4AC4-B8D3-3AEEACDE0C44%40newclarity.net.

Reply via email to