> On Jan 15, 2025, at 2:38 AM, 'Dan Kortschak' via golang-nuts > <golang-nuts@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 2025-01-15 at 02:33 -0500, Mike Schinkel wrote: >> When you say compatibility, what would be a use-case where existing >> code would break? Something related to using reflection that expect >> the exact signature? > > For example https://go.dev/play/p/MLT3byjtGRJ
Thank you. So it seems the issue is the need to instantiate generic functions vs. a type compatibility issue if type casts to derived-from types could be automatic for those same functions. -Mike -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/25F95E77-670E-4AC4-B8D3-3AEEACDE0C44%40newclarity.net.